The existence of UFOs is a wide controversy
that can either be completely fake or actually real. In Condon’s passage he
believes that there really has not been any real evidence to any knowledge of
UFOs existence. However, Condon believes that it is a good study for scientists
to consider because it is a “fruitful direction of scientific advancement.” Comparing
it to Condon’s passage, Hynek also believes that the UFO reports are worth the
study. There needs to be an improvement upon scientist’s research on the UFO
experience. For example he says that there needs to be more psychological
studies on those people who claim to have seen citings. There are many UFO
citing, but it all matters if they are significantly persistent. The last
doctor, was Paynter who believed that UFOs actually could be real and that
scientists need to have more sufficient evidence to prove its existence. I like Paynter’s argument because it has
more common sense to it and stays between the lines of the argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment